Modifications

Borreliose-Centrum-Augsburg (voir la source)

Version du 25 juillet 2019 à 15:56

682 octets ajoutés , 25 juillet 2019 à 15:56

aucun résumé des modifications

Ligne 278 : Ligne 278 :

* https://www.jim.fr/medecin/actualites/pro_societe/e-docs/maladies_de_non_lyme_les_souffrances_ignorees_de_notre_societe_170915/document_actu_pro.phtml+&cd=3&hl=fr&ct=clnk&gl=fr Article de Aurélie Haroche, publié le 28/03/2018 (accès payant) Maladies de "non Lyme" : les souffrances ignorées de notre société Paris, le mercredi 28 mars 2018 - Ce sont cinq journalistes danois. En bonne santé, jusqu'à preuve du contraire. Et cette preuve leur a été donnée de manière cinglante. Ayant adressé un échantillon sanguin à la clinique allemande d'Augsburg, spécialisée dans la prise en charge de la maladie de Lyme, tous ont obtenu un résultat saisissant. Leur sérologie était positive ! Bien qu’imparfaite, cette démonstration met en évidence le manque certain de fiabilité des tests mis en œuvre par ceux qui prétendent offrir une véritable réponse face à la [[maladie de Lyme]], là où les praticiens respectant les recommandations officielles manqueraient à leur devoir vis-à-vis des malades. L’enquête des journalistes danois confirme l’existence du développement de véritables arnaques autour de la [[maladie de Lyme]], reposant notamment sur la diffusion de prétendus tests (dont le manque de fiabilité a été rappelé par la Food and Drug Administration aux États-Unis) et de traitements fantaisistes, voire dangereux. [...]

* https://lymescience.org/journalists-expose-german-lyme-clinics-snyd-eller-borrelia-fraud-lyme-disease/ Journalists Expose German “Lyme” Clinics. En 2016, des journalistes danois de TV2 ont diffusé Snyd eller borrelia ("Fraude ou Lyme Disease"), un documentaire sur les cliniques allemandes "Lyme". En 2017, une version néerlandaise du documentaire a été montrée par Zembla. Les liens pertinents sont ci-dessous. [...]

−

* https://journalistforbundet.dk/sites/default/files/inline-files/Cavling2017 - nr. 40.pdf Setting for Cavling Prize 2017 November 3, 2017. The two journalists Michael Bech and Ketil Alstrup were behind the TV 2 documentary 'Snyd or Borrelia', which revealed how Danish patients are fooled by private doctors to believe they are sick of Borrelia and the lure for expensive treatments for Borrelia using deeply untrustworthy blood test assays. The doctors say they have treated thousands of patients that way, and that is a problem which for years has been described in Danish media with assertion-against-claims angles - Danish doctors courage private borrelia doctors. But who was right? With this documentary and the included news angles on web and tv, the two journalists have managed to bring the debate on Borrelia a big step further for the benefit for anyone who in the future risks putting health and money at risk during treatment with the private Borrelia doctors. That's why Michael Bech and Ketil Alstrup are worthy of the Cavling prize. In order to get the documentation in place, the journalists had to use both hidden camera, access documents tire identities and confrontational interviews. The resistance of doctors and individual patient groups has been both before and after the program, but two press committee cases have been decided this year without criticism of TV 2. Moreover, a Danish clinic this year has been sanctioned because of the disclosures in the documentary. The idea for the program emerged after several patients approached the editorial staff. They were frustrated about that Danish doctors would not treat them with antibiotics, even though they had been analyzed their blood at recognized laboratories in Germany, and doctors had found an active borrelia infection in the blood. Some of the patients, these blood samples and the responses were communicated via the Nordic Clinic, located at Strøget in Copenhagen, and at that time a Danish doctor and dietician had attached. There were several patient groups on the web and Facebook, where patients compared samples and exchanged experiences. This is mainly due to the fact that most people felt that they were afflicted by Danish doctors when they showed up the blood test results. Common to the patients is that they experience bad symptoms like Danish doctors either could not diagnose or even had doctors made a diagnosis but could not offer a treatment satisfactory to the patient. The journalists conducted a large number of background interviews and the picture clearly showed that the vast majority of Danish patients had their blood analyzed and thus been diagnosed with Borrelia infection in the laboratories BCA Clinic or Armin Labs in Augsburg. The actual treatment of the patients in the private doctors were based on long-lasting and powerful antibiotic treatment as well as several other and more alternative therapies. The patients had often used many thousands of dollars alone on the diagnosis and the treatment was quickly more expensive. One of the most expensive examples was about DKK 500,000 as a former professional soccer player had paid in the hope of getting well, but it was in vain. The journalists interviewed his widow to the TV 2 News, the day the documentary was sent. Among the many cases, the journalists asked three of them whether they would participate in a program that was supposed to examine what was up and down with the private doctors' diagnoses. One was an older man, as in years had had symptoms that could not be treated. He had spent about 250,000 on diagnosis and treatment by foreign doctors. The other was a 3-year-old girl who had been given diagnosed by Armin Labs and had been recommended treatment by a doctor in Cologne. The third was a new baked mother, who had just been diagnosed with ALS by Danish doctors - a disease that is incurable and lethal. She had been diagnosed with Borrelia at the BCA Clinic and a promise of healing. Journalists Bech and Alstrup from TV 2 chose to focus on the diagnosis itself. What would happen if you did five healthy patients send blood to the German laboratories? If they all came back negative for Borrelia, so the method would be worth investigating and comparing with the Danish. Come on back positive for Borrelia infection, then the German doctors test would be unreliable and thus would the treatment be groundless. As test subjects, the choice fell on four of TV 2's news hosts and a colleague from TV 2's documentary group. The Four hosts are people the viewers themselves can see on the screen where they are healthy and healthy. They were all five tested in advance with the ELISA test and none of the five had antibodies to Borrelia. The journalists behind the documentary then found five names for the hosts. There was to be real people for this, as the payment was made by credit card and if you could google to the names belonged journalists, so the test might not be done as normal. Over a couple of months the blood samples were sent. The three test persons described the fake symptoms such as headache, neck pain and a tick bite in connection with the request blood tests. But two of the test persons ordered the test completely without mentioning any symptoms. And everyone Five ended up being diagnosed with Borrelia. Finally, the Danish journalists confront the German doctors who appear extremely untrustworthy in their argument. One doctor subsequently complains to the press board, but neither is there any reason here for criticism. Based on the disclosures in the program, the Danish Agency for Patient Safety initiated an investigation the Danish partner for the German laboratories - Nordic Clinic. This led to several sanctions, among other things. because: "''The disease can be assumed to pose a risk to patient safety due to non-compliance guidance on introducing new treatments in the health service. ''” The debate about the diagnosis of Borrelia with undocumented test methods is a problem that affects thousands of patients in Europe and the United States. The documentary has since been shown on television abroad and ZDF's investigative television magazine 21 Frontal has made a longer feature based on recordings from documentary. In a media landscape where many stories are run by pure conflict without a position on where the truth lies, then I think Michael Bech and Ketil Alstrup have conducted a Cavling-worthy piece of journalism. Yours sincerely, Signe Daugbjerg (anglais) Traduction: Les deux journalistes Michael Bech et Ketil Alstrup sont à l'origine du documentaire 'Snyd or Borrelia', qui a révélé comment les patients danois sont trompés par des médecins privés qui leur font croire qu'ils sont malades de la Borrelia et les leurrent, en utilisant des analyses de sang très peu fiables, pour des traitements coûteux pour Borrelia. Les médecins [privés] disent qu'ils ont traité des milliers de patients de cette façon là [...] Mais qui avait raison ? Grâce à ce documentaire et aux informations diffusées sur le web et à la télévision, les deux journalistes ont réussi à faire avancer le débat sur Borrelia d'un grand pas pour le bénéfice de tous ceux qui, à l'avenir, risquent de mettre leur santé et leur argent en danger pendant leur traitement avec les médecins privés Borrelia. C'est pourquoi Michael Bech et Ketil Alstrup méritent le prix Cavling.

+

* https://journalistforbundet.dk/sites/default/files/inline-files/Cavling2017 - nr. 40.pdf Setting for Cavling Prize 2017 November 3, 2017. The two journalists Michael Bech and Ketil Alstrup were behind the TV 2 documentary 'Snyd or Borrelia', which revealed how Danish patients are fooled by private doctors to believe they are sick of Borrelia and the lure for expensive treatments for Borrelia using deeply untrustworthy blood test assays. The doctors say they have treated thousands of patients that way, and that is a problem which for years has been described in Danish media with assertion-against-claims angles - Danish doctors courage private borrelia doctors. But who was right? With this documentary and the included news angles on web and tv, the two journalists have managed to bring the debate on Borrelia a big step further for the benefit for anyone who in the future risks putting health and money at risk during treatment with the private Borrelia doctors. That's why Michael Bech and Ketil Alstrup are worthy of the Cavling prize. In order to get the documentation in place, the journalists had to use both hidden camera, access documents tire identities and confrontational interviews. The resistance of doctors and individual patient groups has been both before and after the program, but two press committee cases have been decided this year without criticism of TV 2. Moreover, a Danish clinic this year has been sanctioned because of the disclosures in the documentary. The idea for the program emerged after several patients approached the editorial staff. They were frustrated about that Danish doctors would not treat them with antibiotics, even though they had been analyzed their blood at recognized laboratories in Germany, and doctors had found an active borrelia infection in the blood. Some of the patients, these blood samples and the responses were communicated via the Nordic Clinic, located at Strøget in Copenhagen, and at that time a Danish doctor and dietician had attached. There were several patient groups on the web and Facebook, where patients compared samples and exchanged experiences. This is mainly due to the fact that most people felt that they were afflicted by Danish doctors when they showed up the blood test results. Common to the patients is that they experience bad symptoms like Danish doctors either could not diagnose or even had doctors made a diagnosis but could not offer a treatment satisfactory to the patient. The journalists conducted a large number of background interviews and the picture clearly showed that the vast majority of Danish patients had their blood analyzed and thus been diagnosed with Borrelia infection in the laboratories BCA Clinic or Armin Labs in Augsburg. The actual treatment of the patients in the private doctors were based on long-lasting and powerful antibiotic treatment as well as several other and more alternative therapies. The patients had often used many thousands of dollars alone on the diagnosis and the treatment was quickly more expensive. One of the most expensive examples was about DKK 500,000 as a former professional soccer player had paid in the hope of getting well, but it was in vain. The journalists interviewed his widow to the TV 2 News, the day the documentary was sent. Among the many cases, the journalists asked three of them whether they would participate in a program that was supposed to examine what was up and down with the private doctors' diagnoses. One was an older man, as in years had had symptoms that could not be treated. He had spent about 250,000 on diagnosis and treatment by foreign doctors. The other was a 3-year-old girl who had been given diagnosed by Armin Labs and had been recommended treatment by a doctor in Cologne. The third was a new baked mother, who had just been diagnosed with ALS by Danish doctors - a disease that is incurable and lethal. She had been diagnosed with Borrelia at the BCA Clinic and a promise of healing. Journalists Bech and Alstrup from TV 2 chose to focus on the diagnosis itself. What would happen if you did five healthy patients send blood to the German laboratories? If they all came back negative for Borrelia, so the method would be worth investigating and comparing with the Danish. Come on back positive for Borrelia infection, then the German doctors test would be unreliable and thus would the treatment be groundless. As test subjects, the choice fell on four of TV 2's news hosts and a colleague from TV 2's documentary group. The Four hosts are people the viewers themselves can see on the screen where they are healthy and healthy. They were all five tested in advance with the ELISA test and none of the five had antibodies to Borrelia. The journalists behind the documentary then found five names for the hosts. There was to be real people for this, as the payment was made by credit card and if you could google to the names belonged journalists, so the test might not be done as normal. Over a couple of months the blood samples were sent. The three test persons described the fake symptoms such as headache, neck pain and a tick bite in connection with the request blood tests. But two of the test persons ordered the test completely without mentioning any symptoms. And everyone Five ended up being diagnosed with Borrelia. Finally, the Danish journalists confront the German doctors who appear extremely untrustworthy in their argument. One doctor subsequently complains to the press board, but neither is there any reason here for criticism. Based on the disclosures in the program, the Danish Agency for Patient Safety initiated an investigation the Danish partner for the German laboratories - Nordic Clinic. This led to several sanctions, among other things. because: "''The disease can be assumed to pose a risk to patient safety due to non-compliance guidance on introducing new treatments in the health service. ''” The debate about the diagnosis of Borrelia with undocumented test methods is a problem that affects thousands of patients in Europe and the United States. The documentary has since been shown on television abroad and ZDF's investigative television magazine 21 Frontal has made a longer feature based on recordings from documentary. In a media landscape where many stories are run by pure conflict without a position on where the truth lies, then I think Michael Bech and Ketil Alstrup have conducted a Cavling-worthy piece of journalism. Yours sincerely, Signe Daugbjerg (anglais) Traduction: Les deux journalistes Michael Bech et Ketil Alstrup sont à l'origine du documentaire 'Snyd or Borrelia', qui a révélé comment les patients danois sont trompés par des médecins privés qui leur font croire qu'ils sont malades de la Borrelia et les leurrent, en utilisant des analyses de sang très peu fiables, pour des traitements coûteux pour Borrelia. Les médecins [privés] disent qu'ils ont traité des milliers de patients de cette façon là [...] Mais qui avait raison ? Grâce à ce documentaire et aux informations diffusées sur le web et à la télévision, les deux journalistes ont réussi à faire avancer le débat sur Borrelia d'un grand pas pour le bénéfice de tous ceux qui, à l'avenir, risquent de mettre leur santé et leur argent en danger pendant leur traitement avec les médecins privés Borrelia. C'est pourquoi Michael Bech et Ketil Alstrup méritent le prix Cavling. [...] Le débat sur le diagnostic de Borrelia avec des méthodes de test non documentées est un problème qui touche des milliers de patients en Europe et aux Etats-Unis. Depuis, le documentaire a été diffusé à la télévision à l'étranger et le magazine d'investigation de la ZDF, 21 Frontal, a réalisé un long métrage à partir d'enregistrements de documentaires. Dans un paysage médiatique où beaucoup d'histoires sont gérées par des conflits purs et simples sans une position [claire] sur où se trouve la vérité, je pense que Michael Bech et Ketil Alstrup ont réalisé un reportage digne de Cavling. YSincèrement vôtre, Signé Daugbjerg.

== Voir aussi ==

Pascal

12 795

modifications