Changes

228 bytes added ,  15:14, 27 February 2011
no edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:  
This doctrine can been seen as an interpretation of [[orthomolecular medicine]] (OM), which is based on the ideas of Linus Pauling.  
 
This doctrine can been seen as an interpretation of [[orthomolecular medicine]] (OM), which is based on the ideas of Linus Pauling.  
   −
Pauling himself has been criticised for making overbroad claims.<ref>Barrett, SJ (2001-05-05). [http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html "The dark side of Linus Pauling's legacy], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quackwatch Quackwatch]</ref> Raths attempts to give his exaggerated claims scientific semblance are hindered by the fact that even Paulings work does not really support them.
+
Pauling himself has been criticised for making overbroad claims.<ref>Barrett, SJ (2001-05-05). [http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html "The dark side of Linus Pauling's legacy], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quackwatch Quackwatch]</ref> Raths attempts to give his exaggerated claims scientific semblance are hindered by the fact that even Paulings work does not really support them. He also had a fallout with the Linus Pauling Institute(where he worked for some time) and sued them for interfering with his business relationships.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/12/matthiasrath.southafrica</ref>
    
==The case Dominik Feld==
 
==The case Dominik Feld==
reviewer
820

edits