Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte removed ,  15:44, 24 February 2011
m
Typo
Line 9: Line 9:  
Bearden was among the inventors of the "Motionless electromagnetic generator" (MEG), a [[Perpetuum Motion]] device which allegedly creates a hundred times more energy than it consumes. The "energy source" is claimed to be "vacuum energy". Evidence, that the generator actually worked was never provided. While a patent was granted<ref>U.S. Patent 6,362,718</ref>, the patent never states that the device should produce energy. Also, "Patented" only means that it's been given a number by the US government, nothing more. It doesn't in any way endorse the product or idea, nor does it indicate that it works — at all.  
 
Bearden was among the inventors of the "Motionless electromagnetic generator" (MEG), a [[Perpetuum Motion]] device which allegedly creates a hundred times more energy than it consumes. The "energy source" is claimed to be "vacuum energy". Evidence, that the generator actually worked was never provided. While a patent was granted<ref>U.S. Patent 6,362,718</ref>, the patent never states that the device should produce energy. Also, "Patented" only means that it's been given a number by the US government, nothing more. It doesn't in any way endorse the product or idea, nor does it indicate that it works — at all.  
   −
The MEG was never put into production, in January 2005, Tom Bearden claimed he needed about $11 million to develop it to a viable commercial form within a year.<ref>[http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/051605.htm ''MEG Funding''], January on Tom Beardens Website</ref> In May 2005, he stated that 'last working demonstrator was promptly destroyed' by new staff.<ref>[http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/051605.htm ''"Correspondence 051605''], May 2005 on Tom Beardens Website</ref>In 2009, he claimed that development was "on hold" pending the release of funds from the UN<ref>[http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/020209.htm Correspondence 020209], February 2009 on Tom Beardens Website</ref>. As of 2011, the MEG is still not in production.
+
The MEG was never put into production, in January 2005, Tom Bearden claimed he needed about $11 million to develop it to a viable commercial form within a year.<ref>[http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/051605.htm ''MEG Funding''], January on Tom Beardens Website</ref> In May 2005, he stated that 'last working demonstrator was promptly destroyed' by new staff.<ref>[http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/051605.htm ''Correspondence 051605''], May 2005 on Tom Beardens Website</ref>In 2009, he claimed that development was "on hold" pending the release of funds from the UN<ref>[http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/020209.htm Correspondence 020209], February 2009 on Tom Beardens Website</ref>. As of 2011, the MEG is still not in production.
    
A further so called "overunity" machine of Bearden is ''The Magnetic Wankel Engine'' aka ''Takahashi Motor'', which is (according to him) actively suppressed by japanese corporations<ref>[http://www.cheniere.org/misc/wankel.htm The Magnetic Wankel Engine] on Tom Beardens Website</ref>  
 
A further so called "overunity" machine of Bearden is ''The Magnetic Wankel Engine'' aka ''Takahashi Motor'', which is (according to him) actively suppressed by japanese corporations<ref>[http://www.cheniere.org/misc/wankel.htm The Magnetic Wankel Engine] on Tom Beardens Website</ref>  
reviewer
820

edits

Navigation menu