Changes

==Undocumented experiment on February 10, 2011==

==Undocumented experiment on February 10, 2011==

On February&nbsp;10, 2011 a further "internal test", attended by the allegedly "independent" physics instructor Guiseppe Levi from Bologna University, was made with the "E-Cat" in Bologna. Several websites purport the test instead took place on February&nbsp;18, 2011. According to Guiseppe Levi's description, published in a Swedish online article with the title ''"Cold Fusion: 18&nbsp;hour test excludes combustion"''<ref>Mats Lewan: ''Cold Fusion: 18&nbsp;hour test excludes combustion'', "nyteknik.se", article from February 23, 2011. [http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3108242.ece Text]</ref>, the device was connected through a hose to a regular water tap to cool the "reactor". Tap water was said to flow through the device with about 1&nbsp;liter per second and to be heated by 5&nbsp;degree. The test was run for 18&nbsp;hours, a water meter quantified the flow and was checked by video during the night. The "reactor" was allegedly heated up for 10&nbsp;minutes with 1,250&nbsp;Watt and afterwards only the controlling device was supplied with 80&nbsp;Watt. This would imply a constant thermal output of 15-20 Kilowatt. According to Levi, 0,4&nbsp;grammes of hydrogen were used in those 18&nbsp;hours. The same source quotes Levi with the comment he now excluded "chemical energy" as heat source:

On February&nbsp;10, 2011 a further "internal test", attended by the allegedly "independent" physics instructor Guiseppe Levi from Bologna University, was made with the "E-Cat" in Bologna. Several websites purport the test instead took place on February&nbsp;18, 2011. Levi is the leader of a workgroup of the department of physics which got a financial contribution for their support of the project. According to Guiseppe Levi's description, published in a Swedish online article with the title ''"Cold Fusion: 18&nbsp;hour test excludes combustion"''<ref>Mats Lewan: ''Cold Fusion: 18&nbsp;hour test excludes combustion'', "nyteknik.se", article from February 23, 2011. [http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3108242.ece Text]</ref>, the device was connected through a hose to a regular water tap to cool the "reactor". Tap water was said to flow through the device with about 1&nbsp;liter per second and to be heated by 5&nbsp;degree. The test was run for 18&nbsp;hours, a water meter quantified the flow and was checked by video during the night. The "reactor" was allegedly heated up for 10&nbsp;minutes with 1,250&nbsp;Watt and afterwards only the controlling device was supplied with 80&nbsp;Watt. This would imply a constant thermal output of 15-20 Kilowatt. According to Levi, 0,4&nbsp;grammes of hydrogen were used in those 18&nbsp;hours. The same source quotes Levi with the comment he now excluded "chemical energy" as heat source:

:''...Now that I have seen the device work for so many hours, in my view all chemical energy sources are excluded..''.  

:''...Now that I have seen the device work for so many hours, in my view all chemical energy sources are excluded..''.