Changes

==Overview cellular medicine==

==Overview cellular medicine==

The claims of healing properties of the [[cellular medicine]] have been shown as invalid by scientific studies. In industrial nations vitamin deficiency is very seldom a problem and would have to be diagnosed individually. Only then the actually missing vitamins should be substituted. That's especially the case for liposoluble vitamins.

The claims of healing properties of the [[cellular medicine]] have been shown as invalid by scientific studies. In industrial nations vitamin deficiency is very seldom a problem and would have to be diagnosed individually. Only then the actually missing vitamins should be substituted. An overdose of vitamins can have grave sideeffects. That's especially the case for liposoluble vitamins.

This doctrine can been seen as an interpretation of [[orthomolecular medicine]] (OM), which is based on the ideas of Linus Pauling.  

This doctrine can been seen as an interpretation of [[orthomolecular medicine]] (OM), which is based on the ideas of Linus Pauling.  

Pauling himself has been criticised for making overbroad claims.<ref>Barrett, SJ (2001-05-05). [http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html "The dark side of Linus Pauling's legacy], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quackwatch Quackwatch]</ref> Raths attempts to give his exaggerated claims scientific semblance are hindered by the fact that even Paulings work does not really support them. He also had a fallout with the Linus Pauling Institute(where he worked for some time) and sued them for interfering with his business relationships.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/12/matthiasrath.southafrica</ref>

Pauling himself has been criticized for making overbroad claims.<ref>Barrett, SJ (2001-05-05). [http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html "The dark side of Linus Pauling's legacy], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quackwatch Quackwatch]</ref> Rath's attempts to give his own exaggerated claims scientific semblance are hindered by the fact that even Pauling's work does not really support them. His employment by the Linus Pauling Institute ended in a fallout and he sued it for interfering with his business relationships.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/12/matthiasrath.southafrica</ref>

==The case Dominik Feld==

==The case Dominik Feld==