Changes

This doctrine can been seen as an interpretation of [[orthomolecular medicine]] (OM), which is based on the ideas of Linus Pauling.  

This doctrine can been seen as an interpretation of [[orthomolecular medicine]] (OM), which is based on the ideas of Linus Pauling.  

Pauling himself has been criticised for making overbroad claims.<ref>Barrett, SJ (2001-05-05). [http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html "The dark side of Linus Pauling's legacy], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quackwatch Quackwatch]</ref> Raths attempts to give his exaggerated claims scientific semblance are hindered by the fact that even Paulings work does not really support them.

Pauling himself has been criticised for making overbroad claims.<ref>Barrett, SJ (2001-05-05). [http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html "The dark side of Linus Pauling's legacy], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quackwatch Quackwatch]</ref> Raths attempts to give his exaggerated claims scientific semblance are hindered by the fact that even Paulings work does not really support them. He also had a fallout with the Linus Pauling Institute(where he worked for some time) and sued them for interfering with his business relationships.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/12/matthiasrath.southafrica</ref>

==The case Dominik Feld==

==The case Dominik Feld==