Änderungen

:''As the invention seems, at least at first, to offend against the generally accepted laws of physics and established theories, the disclosure should be detailed enough to prove to a skilled person conversant with mainstream science and technology that the invention is indeed feasible. [...] In the present case, the invention does not provide experimental evidence (nor any firm theoretical basis) which would enable the skilled person to assess the viability of the invention. The description is essentially based on general statement and speculations which are not apt to provide a clear and exhaustive technical teaching.''<ref>http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wads.jsp?IA=IT2008000532&LANGUAGE=EN&ID=id00000011868762&VOL=100&DOC=075642&WO=09/125444&WEEK=NA&TYPE=NA&DOC_TYPE=WOSA&TOK=Q309-A-eI6srxLYw7s9qWfbp73Y&PAGE=1</ref>

:''As the invention seems, at least at first, to offend against the generally accepted laws of physics and established theories, the disclosure should be detailed enough to prove to a skilled person conversant with mainstream science and technology that the invention is indeed feasible. [...] In the present case, the invention does not provide experimental evidence (nor any firm theoretical basis) which would enable the skilled person to assess the viability of the invention. The description is essentially based on general statement and speculations which are not apt to provide a clear and exhaustive technical teaching.''<ref>http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wads.jsp?IA=IT2008000532&LANGUAGE=EN&ID=id00000011868762&VOL=100&DOC=075642&WO=09/125444&WEEK=NA&TYPE=NA&DOC_TYPE=WOSA&TOK=Q309-A-eI6srxLYw7s9qWfbp73Y&PAGE=1</ref>

Auf den Webseiten der WIPO ist eine Antwort des Rossi-Patentanwalts Cicogna vom 17.12.2010 aufgeführt, in der dieser auf die angeführten Punkte eingeht.<ref>http://www.psiram.com/doc/application_rossi.004908.pdf</ref> In der Antwort an das münchener europäische Patentamt verzichtete er auf 6 von vormals 15 Ansprüche.

Auf den Webseiten der WIPO ist eine Antwort des Rossi-Patentanwalts Cicogna vom 17.12.2010 aufgeführt, in der dieser auf die angeführten Punkte eingeht.<ref>http://www.psiram.com/doc/application_rossi.004908.pdf</ref> In der Antwort an das münchener europäische Patentamt verzichtete er auf 6 von vormals 15 Ansprüchen. Der Schriftverkehr geht auch auf ein bereits 2005 erteiltes Patent (Arata Yoshiaki: Hydrogen condensate and method of generating heat therewith. Osaka Industries Promotion Org July 2005: EP1551032) des japanischen emeritierten Physikers Yoshiaki Arata ein, der sich seit 1989 mit "kalter Fusion" befasst.  

{{OtherLang|ge=Focardi-Rossi-Energiekatalysator|en=Focardi-Rossi Energy-Catalyzer}}

{{OtherLang|ge=Focardi-Rossi-Energiekatalysator|en=Focardi-Rossi Energy-Catalyzer}}