81.394
Bearbeitungen
Änderungen
keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Sackstedt ignoriert dabei die Tatsache, dass zur Herstellung von Knallgas und bei der Nutzung von Knallgas unweigerlich Energie nicht nur notwendig ist, sondern auch Verluste entstehen.
Sackstedt ignoriert dabei die Tatsache, dass zur Herstellung von Knallgas und bei der Nutzung von Knallgas unweigerlich Energie nicht nur notwendig ist, sondern auch Verluste entstehen.
Wie aus öffentlichen Anfragen im pseudowissenschaftlichen "Journal of Nuclear Physics" nachzulesen ist, versuchte Sackstedt 2012 das Konzept des so genannten [[Kalte Fusion]]s Reaktors (angeblich für den Hausgebrauch geeignet) seinen Lesern näherzubringen.<ref>Diskussionsseiten des "journal of nuclear physics" (2012):<br>Andrea Rossi
Wie aus öffentlichen Anfragen im pseudowissenschaftlichen "Journal of Nuclear Physics" nachzulesen ist, versuchte Sackstedt 2012 das Konzept des so genannten [[Kalte Fusion]]s Reaktors [[Focardi-Rossi-Energiekatalysator]] (angeblich für den Hausgebrauch geeignet) seinen Lesern näherzubringen.<ref>Diskussionsseiten des "journal of nuclear physics" (2012):<br>Andrea Rossi
January 29th, 2012 at 10:45 AM
January 29th, 2012 at 10:45 AM
Dear Ulrich F. Sackstedt:
Dear Ulrich F. Sackstedt:
Warm Regards,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A.R.
<br>
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
January 29th, 2012 at 8:05 AM
January 29th, 2012 at 8:05 AM
as I found some articles on this Blog which seem to support a certain new model of nuclear chemics / ohysics I want to ask you which model you prefer or if there is general model been worked out currently. For to explain this new cold fusion to my average educated readers I have to offer a good understandable theory without any mathematical calculations.
as I found some articles on this Blog which seem to support a certain new model of nuclear chemics / ohysics I want to ask you which model you prefer or if there is general model been worked out currently. For to explain this new cold fusion to my average educated readers I have to offer a good understandable theory without any mathematical calculations.
I’d appreciate to get a clue from you.
I’d appreciate to get a clue from you.
<br>
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
January 27th, 2012 at 4:35 AM
January 27th, 2012 at 4:35 AM
Thanks Mr. Rossi, for that great opportunity!
Thanks Mr. Rossi, for that great opportunity!
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
<br>
Andrea Rossi
Andrea Rossi
January 26th, 2012 at 4:03 PM
January 26th, 2012 at 4:03 PM
Warm Regards,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A.R.
<br>
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
January 26th, 2012 at 10:57 AM
January 26th, 2012 at 10:57 AM
as I lost contact to you I’m very interested to continue it here.
as I lost contact to you I’m very interested to continue it here.
I’m author in the field of new energy technologies and would appreciate very much if you gave me an authorized text or any source I may use word by word. If not, I could make a summary of text material if you would provide me with that.
I’m author in the field of new energy technologies and would appreciate very much if you gave me an authorized text or any source I may use word by word. If not, I could make a summary of text material if you would provide me with that.
Pictures would be welcome, too.
Pictures would be welcome, too.<br>
Much success with the practical steps into the market now. Congrates! Pons/Fleischmann did have a hard time either when they began what others didn’t want them to begin.<br>
Much success with the practical steps into the market now. Congrates! Pons/Fleischmann did have a hard time either when they began what others didn’t want them to begin.
Kind regards,
Kind regards,
Ulrich F. Sackstedt, author (Germany)</ref>
Ulrich F. Sackstedt, author (Germany)</ref>