Diskussion:Journal of Creation: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Version vom 10. Dezember 2016, 20:54 Uhr (Quelltext anzeigen) Abrax (Diskussion \| Beiträge) (Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „Gründung 2008? ''The Journal of Creation, on the other hand, claims to be a peer reviewed journal covering "the latest research findings that relate to origi…“)		Aktuelle Version vom 10. Dezember 2016, 21:08 Uhr (Quelltext anzeigen) Abrax (Diskussion \| Beiträge) (Die Seite wurde geleert.)
Zeile 1:		Zeile 1:
−	~~Gründung 2008?~~

−	''The Journal of Creation, on the other hand, claims to be a peer reviewed journal covering "the latest research findings that relate to origins and the biblical account of Creation, the Flood and the Fall".[8] The journal is not just (or at all) scientific in nature, but also treads into any discipline with biblical implications, including Philosophy, History, and Theology. First created in 2008, the journal received immediate criticism for being unscientific, and having little more than "God did it" as its findings[9]. Perhaps more insidiously though, one of their earliest articles was revealed to have been plagiarized from several articles[10], including a legitimate peer review journal which had failed to pick up on the Creationist undertones of one of their articles.'' Zitat von: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Creation_Ministries_International

Aktuelle Version vom 10. Dezember 2016, 21:08 Uhr