Änderungen

Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
1.974 Bytes hinzugefügt ,  16:41, 9. Mär. 2013
keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Zeile 14: Zeile 14:     
Sackstedt ignoriert dabei die Tatsache, dass zur Herstellung von Knallgas und bei der Nutzung von Knallgas unweigerlich Energie nicht nur notwendig ist, sondern auch Verluste entstehen.
 
Sackstedt ignoriert dabei die Tatsache, dass zur Herstellung von Knallgas und bei der Nutzung von Knallgas unweigerlich Energie nicht nur notwendig ist, sondern auch Verluste entstehen.
 +
 +
Wie aus öffentlichen Anfragen im pseudowissenschaftlichen "Journal of Nuclear Physics" nachzulesen ist, versuchte Sackstedt 2012 das Konzept des so genannten [[Kalte Fusion]]s Reaktors (angeblich für den Hausgebrauch geeignet) seinen Lesern näherzubringen.<ref>Diskussionsseiten des "journal of nuclear physics" (2012):<br>Andrea Rossi
 +
January 29th, 2012 at 10:45 AM
 +
Dear Ulrich F. Sackstedt:
 +
I will delivery the theory behind the I.P. as soon as our patent will have been granted.
 +
Warm Regards,
 +
A.R.
 +
 +
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
 +
January 29th, 2012 at 8:05 AM
 +
Hello Mr. Rossi,
 +
as I found some articles on this Blog which seem to support a certain new model of nuclear chemics / ohysics I want to ask you which model you prefer or if there is general model been worked out currently. For to explain this new cold fusion to my average educated readers I have to offer a good understandable theory without any mathematical calculations.
 +
I’d appreciate to get a clue from you.
 +
 +
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
 +
January 27th, 2012 at 4:35 AM
 +
Thanks Mr. Rossi, for that great opportunity!
 +
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
 +
 +
Andrea Rossi
 +
January 26th, 2012 at 4:03 PM
 +
Dear Ulrich Sackstedt:
 +
You can use all the reports and materials you find on Google regarding the E-Cat and all the documents and comments published on the Journal Of Nuclear Physics.
 +
Warm Regards,
 +
A.R.
 +
 +
Ulrich F. Sackstedt
 +
January 26th, 2012 at 10:57 AM
 +
Dear Mr. Rossi,
 +
as I lost contact to you I’m very interested to continue it here.
 +
I’m author in the field of new energy technologies and would appreciate very much if you gave me an authorized text or any source I may use word by word. If not, I could make a summary of text material if you would provide me with that.
 +
Pictures would be welcome, too.
 +
 +
Much success with the practical steps into the market now. Congrates! Pons/Fleischmann did have a hard time either when they began what others didn’t want them to begin.
 +
 +
Kind regards,
 +
Ulrich F. Sackstedt, author (Germany)</ref>
    
==Kurzbiographie==
 
==Kurzbiographie==
81.394

Bearbeitungen

Navigationsmenü