| '''[http://www.cavehill.uwi.edu/bnccde/ph29a/thagard.html Why Astrology Is A Pseudoscience] (engl.)'''
+
| "Most philosophers and historians of science agree that [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrologie '''astrology'''] is a [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudowissenschaft '''pseudoscience'''], but there is little agreement on why it is a pseudoscience. Answers range from matters of [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verifizierung '''verifiability'''] and [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifikation '''falsifiability'''] to questions of progress and Kuhnian normal science, to the different sorts of objections raised by a large panel of scientists recently organized by The Humanist magazine. Of course there are also Feyerabendian anarchists and others who say that no demarcation of science from pseudoscience is possible. However, I shall propose a criterion for distinguishing disciplines as pseudoscientific; this criterion is unlike verificationist and falsificationist attempts in that it introduces social and historical features as well as logical ones..."
+
| [http://journal.philsci.org/ '''Philosophy of Science''']
+
| {{|1978.??.??
+
| [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Thagard '''Paul R. Thagard''']