Änderungen

Als das "Feature" aus [[Truther]]kreisen vermehrt als angeblicher Beweis für Verschwörungstheorien zum 11. Septermber 2001 zitiert wurde, reagierten die Herausgeber mit einer gemeinsamen Erklärung:

Als das "Feature" aus [[Truther]]kreisen vermehrt als angeblicher Beweis für Verschwörungstheorien zum 11. Septermber 2001 zitiert wurde, reagierten die Herausgeber mit einer gemeinsamen Erklärung:

:''"Regarding the recent developments on social media, we would like to inform the public that neither the European Scientific Journal, ESJ, nor the European Scientific Institute, ESI have published content on 9/11 attacks."''  

:''"Regarding the recent developments on social media, we would like to inform the public that neither the European Scientific Journal, ESJ, nor the European Scientific Institute, ESI have published content on 9/11 attacks."'' <ref>https://eujournal.org/files/journals/1/documents/Disclaimer.ESJ.pdf</ref>

Etwas später folgte ein Nachtrag:  

Etwas später folgte ein Nachtrag:  

:''"EPN is a magazine that publishes a range of news and views to stimulate discussion – unlike peer reviewed research which would be published in a scholarly journal. EDP Sciences [their parent company] follows the most rigorous peer review standards for its journals of which EPN is not one.<br>As a magazine, the editorial policy of EPN is to publish news and views, which are sometimes controversial. EDP Sciences recognizes that the article discusses some speculative and controversial issues. However EPN and EDP Sciences believe that the best (and the most scientific) way to settle such issues is to publish them and have an open discussion with all due arguments in which the truth will finally emerge. A counter article is to be published by EPN in the next issue"'' (siehe: [https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/abs/2017/01/epn2017481p18/epn2017481p18.html]).

:''"EPN is a magazine that publishes a range of news and views to stimulate discussion – unlike peer reviewed research which would be published in a scholarly journal. EDP Sciences [their parent company] follows the most rigorous peer review standards for its journals of which EPN is not one.<br>As a magazine, the editorial policy of EPN is to publish news and views, which are sometimes controversial. EDP Sciences recognizes that the article discusses some speculative and controversial issues. However EPN and EDP Sciences believe that the best (and the most scientific) way to settle such issues is to publish them and have an open discussion with all due arguments in which the truth will finally emerge. A counter article is to be published by EPN in the next issue"'' <ref>https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/abs/2017/01/epn2017481p18/epn2017481p18.html</ref>

Der Artikel von Steven Jones wurde in den Europhysics News einen Monat später kritisch kommentiert<ref>Jia-Liang Le, Zdeněk P. Bažant: Mechanics-based mathematical studies proving spontaneity of post-impact WTC towers collapse, Europhysics News, Volume 48, Number 1, Januar-February 2017, Seiten 18 - 23, DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2017102</ref> und die offizielle Darstellung der Einsturzusachen bestätigt:

Der Artikel von Steven Jones wurde in den Europhysics News einen Monat später kritisch kommentiert und die offizielle Darstellung der Einsturzusachen bekräftigt:

:''"From the viewpoint of physics, and structural mechanics in particular, it is perfectly clear that no WTC demolition took place. The collapse was triggered by an atypical fire ignited simultaneously in a large volume. It was driven by gravity, and was spontaneous. In hindsight, it was, under the given circumstances, inevitable.“''

:''"From the viewpoint of physics, and structural mechanics in particular, it is perfectly clear that no WTC demolition took place. The collapse was triggered by an atypical fire ignited simultaneously in a large volume. It was driven by gravity, and was spontaneous. In hindsight, it was, under the given circumstances, inevitable.“'' <ref>Jia-Liang Le, Zdeněk P. Bažant: Mechanics-based mathematical studies proving spontaneity of post-impact WTC towers collapse, Europhysics News, Volume 48, Number 1, Januar-February 2017, Seiten 18 - 23, DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2017102</ref>

Auch die Online-Fact-Checking-Website Snopes befasste sich mit dem Artikel.<ref>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/journal-endorses-911-conspiracy-theory/</ref>

Auch die Online-Fact-Checking-Website Snopes befasste sich mit dem Artikel. <ref>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/journal-endorses-911-conspiracy-theory/</ref>

==WTC 7 Evaluation-Study von Leroy Hulsey==

==WTC 7 Evaluation-Study von Leroy Hulsey==