Änderungen

Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Zeile 49: Zeile 49:  
1. Angebliche Zeugenaussagen
 
1. Angebliche Zeugenaussagen
   −
2. Der Appendix C eines Berichts der FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) von Prof. Jonathan Barnett aus dem Jahr 2002 (von dem hartnäckig behauptet wird, er sei später wegen des brisanten Inhalts aus den offiziellen Dokumenten entfernt worden).
+
2. Der Appendix C eines Berichts der FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) von Prof. Jonathan Barnett aus dem Jahr 2002
    
Zu Punkt 1:  
 
Zu Punkt 1:  
Zeile 60: Zeile 60:  
Der oben erwähnte Appendix C erlangte seine Brisanz durch Fehlinterpretationen des folgenden Absatzes:
 
Der oben erwähnte Appendix C erlangte seine Brisanz durch Fehlinterpretationen des folgenden Absatzes:
   −
:''The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. [My emphasis] A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires.''
+
:''The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires.''
   −
Die Fehldeutung beruht auf Unverständnis:
+
Die Fehldeutung, es sei darin von geschmolzenem Stahl die Rede, beruht auf Unverständnis:
    
:''Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel. This sulfur-rich liquid penetrated preferentially down grain boundaries of the steel, severely weakening the beam and making it susceptible to erosion. The eutectic temperature for this mixture strongly suggests that the temperatures in this region of the steel beam approached 1,000° C (1,800°F), which is substantially lower than would be expected for melting this steel.'' ''<ref>https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-8452/403_apc.pdf</ref>
 
:''Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel. This sulfur-rich liquid penetrated preferentially down grain boundaries of the steel, severely weakening the beam and making it susceptible to erosion. The eutectic temperature for this mixture strongly suggests that the temperatures in this region of the steel beam approached 1,000° C (1,800°F), which is substantially lower than would be expected for melting this steel.'' ''<ref>https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-8452/403_apc.pdf</ref>
81.394

Bearbeitungen

Navigationsmenü