Änderungen

Im April 2013 wurde bekannt, dass bereits 2012 wesentliche beantragte Behauptungen (claims) vom europäischen Patentamt zur Patentanmeldung EP2259998 (METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CARRYING OUT NICKEL AND HYDROGEN EXOTHERMAL REACTIONS)<ref>https://register.epo.org/espacenet/application?number=EP08873805&lng=en&tab=main</ref> zurückgewiesen wurden. Bemängelt wurde, dass das gemeinte Funktionsprinzip nicht unmissverständlich erläutert wurde und eine "kalte Fusion" wissenschaftlich nicht anerkannt sei.<ref>https://register.epo.org/espacenet/application?documentId=EUIP1SP64903FI4&number=EP08873805&lng=en&npl=false</ref>

Im April 2013 wurde bekannt, dass bereits 2012 wesentliche beantragte Behauptungen (claims) vom europäischen Patentamt zur Patentanmeldung EP2259998 (METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CARRYING OUT NICKEL AND HYDROGEN EXOTHERMAL REACTIONS)<ref>https://register.epo.org/espacenet/application?number=EP08873805&lng=en&tab=main</ref> zurückgewiesen wurden. Bemängelt wurde, dass das gemeinte Funktionsprinzip nicht unmissverständlich erläutert wurde und eine "kalte Fusion" wissenschaftlich nicht anerkannt sei.<ref>https://register.epo.org/espacenet/application?documentId=EUIP1SP64903FI4&number=EP08873805&lng=en&npl=false</ref>

Ein Patentantrag mit der Nummer US2011/005506 A1 (''Method and apparatus for carrying out nickel and hydrogen exthermal reactions'') wurde von Rossi am 16. September 2010 in den USA eingereicht und am 13. Jänner 2011 durch das Patentamt veröffentlicht. Der Antrag spricht nicht von kalter Fusion sondern beschreibt ein Gerät um mit Nickel und Wasserstoff eine exotherme Reaktion herbeizuführen.<ref>[http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/docs/2011RossiUSPatentApp.pdf Method and Apparatus for carrying out nickel and hydrogen exothermal reaction], United States Patent Application Publication</ref> Das US-Patentamt wies den Antrag mit der Nummer 12/736193 (Anmeldedatum 16.9.2010) am 26.3.2014 zurück.<ref>http://s1177.photobucket.com/user/chris20055/media/rossi_nf_rejection/p1_zpsa73f7d58.jpg.html</ref> Der Gutachter schreibt dazu: ..''The specification is objected to an inoperable. Specifically, there is no evidence in the corpus of nuclear science to substantiate the claim that nickel will spontaneously ionize hydrogen gas and thereafter “absorb” the resulting proton..<br>Note that the reaction 58N(p,γ)59Cu is known and has been experimentally observed, it is in context of an accelerated proton beam into a nickel target. The element of acceleration is necessary in this matter – it is the only way for the proton to overcome the basic Coulomb repulsion between the proton and the nickel nuclei..<br>There is presently no peer-reviewed evidence to demonstrate the spontaneous fusion of nickel and protons. Additionally, one of ordinary skill in the art would be skeptikal that the reaction could occur as claimed because no element overcomes the natural Coulomb repulsion between the interacting nuclei..<br>Additionally, the Examiner notes that if the reaction occurred as claimed by the Applicant, it would also spontaneously occur in nature, This would lead to two important results: first, as a natural phenomenon, it would not be patentable subject matter; second, the ambient supply of hydrogen would cause any sample of nickel to automatically undergo the reaction – a reaction which could produce damaging -and noticeable- gamma emissions. No such emissions have ever been observed.''

Ein Patentantrag mit der Nummer US2011/005506 A1 (''Method and apparatus for carrying out nickel and hydrogen exthermal reactions'') wurde von Rossi am 16. September 2010 in den USA eingereicht und am 13. Jänner 2011 durch das Patentamt veröffentlicht. Der Antrag spricht nicht von kalter Fusion sondern beschreibt ein Gerät um mit Nickel und Wasserstoff eine exotherme Reaktion herbeizuführen.<ref>[http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/docs/2011RossiUSPatentApp.pdf Method and Apparatus for carrying out nickel and hydrogen exothermal reaction], United States Patent Application Publication</ref> Das US-Patentamt wies den Antrag mit der Nummer 12/736193 (Anmeldedatum 16.9.2010) am 26.3.2014 zurück.<ref>http://s1177.photobucket.com/user/chris20055/media/rossi_nf_rejection/p1_zpsa73f7d58.jpg.html</ref> Der Gutachter schreibt dazu: ..''The specification is objected to an inoperable. Specifically, there is no evidence in the corpus of nuclear science to substantiate the claim that nickel will spontaneously ionize hydrogen gas and thereafter “absorb” the resulting proton.. Note that the reaction 58N(p,γ)59Cu is known and has been experimentally observed, it is in context of an accelerated proton beam into a nickel target. The element of acceleration is necessary in this matter – it is the only way for the proton to overcome the basic Coulomb repulsion between the proton and the nickel nuclei.. There is presently no peer-reviewed evidence to demonstrate the spontaneous fusion of nickel and protons. Additionally, one of ordinary skill in the art would be skeptikal that the reaction could occur as claimed because no element overcomes the natural Coulomb repulsion between the interacting nuclei.. Additionally, the Examiner notes that if the reaction occurred as claimed by the Applicant, it would also spontaneously occur in nature, This would lead to two important results: first, as a natural phenomenon, it would not be patentable subject matter; second, the ambient supply of hydrogen would cause any sample of nickel to automatically undergo the reaction – a reaction which could produce damaging -and noticeable- gamma emissions. No such emissions have ever been observed..''

Patente von Francesco Piantelli:

Patente von Francesco Piantelli: